French MPs table proposal to legalize recreational cannabis
On the initiative of François Michel Lambert, elected representative for the Bouches-du-Rhône region, some fifteen MPs today tabled a proposal to legalize recreational cannabis. The aim is to establish a state monopoly on cannabis production and distribution.
An admission of failure
«France's essentially repressive anti-cannabis policy has failed to curb trafficking and reduce consumption. Worse still, demand is constantly on the increase, supply is growing and diversifying, and there is no evidence of any effectiveness in either the criminal justice responses or the prevention measures taken», writes the MP in the introduction to his text.
This observation of failure is made more and more frequently by elected representatives of all stripes, but also by intellectuals, healthcare professionals and civil society organizations. Most recently, an article co-signed by 70 leading figures public statements on the «ineffectiveness of prohibition» and the need to regulate recreational cannabis consumption.
With the aim of putting an end to repression, favoring prevention operations and controlling product quality, François Michel Lambert proposes «to move away from a policy of total repression towards a policy of regulated supervision of production, consumption and sales, combined with a policy of prevention in terms of risky behavior and public health, particularly aimed at the youngest and most vulnerable members of society».
The bill has been co-signed by the following MPs: Sylvia Pinel, Paul Molac, Jean-Michel Clément, Jeanine Dubié, Frédérique Dumas, François Pupponi (Libertés et territoires), Delphine Bagarry, Annie Chapelier, Hubert Julien-Laferrière, Pierre-Alain Raphan and Cécile Rilhac (La République en marche), Régis Juanico (apparenté PS), as well as Eric Coquerel, Loïc Prud'homme (La France insoumise) and Sébastien Nadot (non inscrit).
How should cannabis be regulated?
François Michel Lambert has a very specific vision of cannabis legalization. It would be entirely state-supervised, thanks to the creation of a public agency: the Société d'exploitation du cannabis (SECA). This agency would be responsible for «supplying seeds to farmers authorized to produce cannabis and concluding operating contracts with them». It would then redistribute production by supplying all retailers. It would also be responsible for setting and annually updating minimum prices for cannabis and related products.
According to the MP, this state monopoly would make it possible to develop a French cannabis industry by entrusting cannabis production to farmers and sales to tobacconists. Growers will have to apply to their local prefecture for prior authorization to operate. The opening of sales outlets will also be subject to prior authorization from the departmental prefect and the positive opinion of the mayor of the commune concerned.
«The establishment of a monopoly for the production and sale of cannabis through the creation of a national company, SECA, will make it possible to regulate production and sales while controlling consumption», explains the MP. Sales to minors, consumption in public places and advertising outside sales outlets (in outlets, signs and posters would be authorized) would remain prohibited, as would self-cultivation and cannabis above a THC level to be defined.
There are a thousand and one ways to regulate recreational cannabis use. Government-run distribution monopolies are already in place in some Canadian provinces, and have so far proved very successful. very mixed results. This proposal resembles the model initially implemented by New Brunswick, which had left the management of cannabis entirely to the public sector, and which is currently considering authorizing the private sector to produce and distribute cannabis due to considerable financial losses.
Interviewed by Newsweed on this choice, the deputy replied: «Because civil society is still wary of cannabis, in fear of libertarian liberalism, this provides reassurance through end-to-end State control. What's more, the authorities themselves are worried about the lack of public control over the players involved, so we provide a guarantee. Finally, as with any state monopoly, this allows us to structure a new activity that will upset society's current equilibrium, so we can move forward gradually.
A new proposal?
This seemingly innovative proposal is in fact not so new. In fact, it bears a striking resemblance to an «amendment» tabled by members of the France Insoumise party to protest against article 58 of the Justice reform bill, which introduced lump-sum fines for drug offences. They themselves seemed to have taken elements from’a proposed law tabled in 2017 by deputy Noël Mamère.
-
Cannabis in Africa14 hours ago
Nigeria moves a step closer to legalizing medical cannabis
-
Business4 weeks ago
Will CBD edibles be banned on May 15 in France? An update on the situation
-
Cannabis in France3 days ago
Le Champ d’en Face aims to bring hemp back into the public discourse
-
Cannabis in France2 days ago
French CBD industry to challenge CBD product control plan in court
-
Cannabis in the Caribbean3 days ago
Antigua and Barbuda: When Cannabis Becomes a Cultural Destination and a Tool for Sovereignty
-
Cannabinoids3 days ago
Japan bans CBN
-
Cannabis in the U.S.2 days ago
Trump's reclassification of cannabis is being challenged in court
-
Cannabis in France3 weeks ago
Medical cannabis: 92% of the French in favor but 0 access


marieclaude
23 June 2019 at 18 h 47 min
Wouldn't legalizing cannabis be irresponsible for health and safety in the workplace, when we know that drugs have already been added to the list of major factors threatening workers» safety? For more information, see »Preventing drug addiction in the workplace": http://www.officiel-prevention.com/sante-hygiene-medecine-du-travail-sst/service-de-sante-au-travail-reglementations/detail_dossier_CHSCT.php?rub=37&ssrub=151&dossid=342 …
combustiondemerde
July 9, 2019 at 16 h 55 min
marieclaude I'd say no, for several reasons.
I quote from your article: «A preventive drug policy makes it possible to get ahead of addiction problems in the workplace, or at least prevent them from getting worse. « . As a reminder, cannabis is illegal. Cannabis prevention today is pitiful. This is mainly due to the fact that it is illegal and taboo.
Legalization = better prevention (by redirecting funds currently allocated to repression) = fewer people stoned at work.
Secondly, I'd say that today, in practice, nothing prevents anyone from arriving at work having consumed canna. Legalization won't aggravate this state of affairs, and will perhaps even accentuate controls.
I'm glad you turned your comment into a question because you seem open to dialogue. However, I don't see any «?» and so I assume you're only feigning questioning and camping your position, but only you know that...