Nicolas Hachet: «Decriminalizing cannabis in France is entirely feasible».»
Lawyer Nicolas Hachet is due to appear before the Bordeaux Court of Appeal at 2pm on Tuesday. On the agenda: the decriminalization of cannabis in France. He has filed a Question Prioritaire de Constitutionnalité (QPC), with the aim of bringing decriminalization before the highest judicial authorities. He believes he could be the man to do away with the cannabis of the French Penal Code.
Newsweed: You believe that cannabis can be decriminalized in France. Is this really feasible?
Nicolas Hachet: Yes, theoretically it's feasible. But it's not up to me. There are three big stages left, and for the moment we haven't started yet.
What is a Priority Question of Constitutionality? And why did you file one?
In France, everyone has the right to question the law. This is the principle of the QPC. I question the’article L3421-1 of the public health code. It's this article that establishes the offence of unlawful use of narcotics. In my opinion, this article contravenes the’article 4 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, of 1789, which emphasizes individual freedom.
Do you believe that the offence of drug use violates individual freedom?
Yes, but in 1994, the French Supreme Court said that this limitation on individual freedom was justified by a public health issue. But as far as I'm concerned, this justification is no longer possible since the’introduction of a €200 fine for cannabis consumption. Taking drugs is a symptom of an illness. And we don't punish the sick with a €200 fine. Or maybe it's not a disease. But in that case, why punish? If the magistrates tell me that we're punishing because it's a psychotropic drug, then I'll reply that alcohol is authorized in France. And if I'm told that alcohol is authorized because it's a form of French tradition, then I'd retort that’in France, 12 % of the adult population smoke cannabis. This is also a form of tradition.
What steps need to be taken before decriminalization?
Firstly, my Question Prioritaire de Constitutionnalité (QPC) is due to be examined this Tuesday by the Bordeaux Court of Appeal. The judges [the names of the magistrates of the Court of Appeal, editor's note]. are going to put the law penalizing cannabis on trial. If they consider my QPC admissible, they send it to the Cour de cassation. The Court then makes a preliminary examination. Then, if it deems the QPC admissible, it forwards it to the Constitutional Council. They can then judge whether or not it's a fair law.
You think your reasoning will convince the magistrates? That you can be the man to decriminalize cannabis in France?
Yes, it happened in Germany in 1994. The case was referred to the Federal Constitutional Court, which ruled opted to decriminalize cannabis. All legal experts are familiar with this ruling. In France, the fixed fine for cannabis consumption is €200. So I'm not asking for the moon! If it's a 200€ fine, it must not be very serious in the eyes of the authorities.
-
Business3 weeks ago
Will CBD edibles be banned on May 15 in France? An update on the situation
-
Cannabis in France2 days ago
Le Champ d’en Face aims to bring hemp back into the public discourse
-
Cannabis in the Caribbean2 days ago
Antigua and Barbuda: When Cannabis Becomes a Cultural Destination and a Tool for Sovereignty
-
Cannabis in France2 days ago
French CBD industry to challenge CBD product control plan in court
-
Cannabinoids2 days ago
Japan bans CBN
-
Cannabis in the U.S.1 day ago
Trump's reclassification of cannabis is being challenged in court
-
Cannabis in France3 weeks ago
Medical cannabis: 92% of the French in favor but 0 access
-
Cannabis in Austria4 weeks ago
Austrian court deals first blow to proposed tobacco monopoly on hemp flowers


osirion
10 February 2021 at 11 h 09 min
Mte Achet is right, the three legal steps are not the simplest:
1°) The 1961 International Convention on Narcotic Drugs (USA and UN), which serves as the penal reference for the foggy schedule of narcotics, will have to be repealed or reformed.
2°) Article 222-41 of the French penal code (law of 31-12-1970), which sentences a dealer to 20 years' imprisonment, will then have to be repealed. But Mr. Chabant Delmas' negligence has been protected since
50 years by all elected representatives of the right and extreme right (otherwise it would already have been repealed).
3°) Then the no less frivolous article 34-01 of the public health code, initiated by Mr. Sarkozy and his accomplices, whose elected representatives are in the current government and/or the Constitutional Council. In doing so, the signatories of this text are elected representatives, deputies, senators, etc...
This fascist «conspiracy» will do everything in its power not to change the law, because it's not a public health law at all, but revenge against the freedom of a section of youth (1968) who refuse this idealistic proscription stemming from unacknowledged religious dogmas.
Then there's the argument that this policy of repression has failed miserably, failing to assess the criminal consequences it engenders, and continues to propagate crimes and trafficking that don't seem to move successive governments, confirming the existence of the «conspiracy» of elected officials, as mentioned above.
Finally, the new factual economic argument is the legalization of the recreational cannabis market on the New York Stock Exchange, putting an end to all illegality of the plant and its economy.
In fact, France, which welcomes the whole world, will not be able to prevent the world's legal cannabis market from operating on its territory under the pretext of wanting to penalize the French for this use. It would have to discriminate against the fact and also prohibit French people from investing in the shares of the legal Wall Street «drug trade», which is only possible in a dictatorship that is not part of the international market.